P.O.R.N. Diets

I am coining this term as I feel some of the diets out there are so radical they need to be discussed in one place.

We here from our favorite celebrities daily and some of us live for this. We follow them on Twitter, talk about them on Bebo and MySpace or e mail each other about them especially when a new diet is talked about.

There have been some over the top radical diets in the past like the 'Air diet', not a very popular one for obvious reasons unlike the 'Chocolate' diet. Then there is the more main stream 'Atkins' diet or 'The Dash Diet' or even 'The South Beach Diet'. All have there plus and minus points and their advocates and nay sayers as well.

The trick when it comes to diets if there is a trick in selecting one would be to thoroughly research the topic. The mere fact that there literally are thousands of diets commercially available shown on television, billboards or even your local Chemist shop.

Here will be many, many articles pertaining to the topic of P.O.R.N. Diets circulating our media and your opinion on them is most welcome. Maybe you have been on one and would like to praise it or maybe warn others away from it. Whatever you may like to share, diet related, please do.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Added Information Regarding The Low Carb Diet

By Julia Gorner

The expression low-carbohydrate diet today is largely powerfully linked with the Atkins Diet. Nevertheless, there is an collection of other diets that share to changeable degrees the equal principles (e.g. the Zone Diet, the Protein Power Lifeplan, the Go Lower Diet and the South Beach Diet. Consequently, there is no widely accepted explanation of what precisely constitutes a low-carbohydrate diet. It is important to note that the quantity of carbohydrate consumption defined as low-carbohydrate by medical experts may be dissimilar than the quantity of carbohydrate defined by diet advisors. For the reasons of this debate, we focus on diets that reduce (nutritive) carbohydrate intake adequately to radically reduce or get rid of insulin production in the body and to encourage ketosis (making of ketones to be used as energy in place of glucose).

Although originally a low carb diet formed based on anecdotal facts of their effectiveness, today there is a a lot better theoretical basis on which these diets depend. The main scientific principle which forms the source for these diets is the liaison between use of carbohydrates and the following outcome on blood sugar (i.e. blood glucose) and on creation of some hormones. Blood sugar levels in the human body must be maintained in a fairly slim range to continue health. Both primary hormones related to regulating blood sugar levels, created in the pancreas, are insulin, that lowers blood sugar levels (amid numerous other effects, most of significant importance metabolically), and glucagon, which raises blood sugar levels. In general, most western diets (and various others) are suitably high in nutritive carbohydrates that virtually all meals evoke insulin secretion from the beta cells in the pancreas; carbohydrates that are digested to deliver glucose in the blood stream are the main control for insulin secretion. A further bearing of insulin secretion is control of ketosis; in the non-ketotic state, the human body stores dietary fat in fat cells (ie, adipose tissue) an preferentially uses glucose as cellular energy. No glucose is changed to fat and then stored in fat cells; animals, with humans, need the necessary enzymatic machinery required to do this as plants generally do have the crucial machinery. By comparison, low-carbohydrate diets, or more properly, diets that are very low in nutritive carbohydrates, suggest less insulin (to cover the ingested glucose in the blood stream), leading to longer and more frequent episodes of ketosis. Some researchers suggest that this causes body fat to be eliminated from the body although this premise remains, at best, notorious, if it refers to emission of lipids (ie, fat and oil) and not to fat metabolism throughout ketosis.

Low carb diet advocates in general suggest reducing nutritive carbohydrates (usually referred to as "net carbs," i.e. grams of total carbohydrates reduced by the non-nutritive carbohydrates) to extremely low levels. This means sharply dropping intake of desserts, breads, pastas, potatoes, rice, and further sweet or starchy foods. A few suggest levels as low as 20-30 grams of "net carbs" per day, at slightest in the initial stages of dieting (for comparison, a single slice of white bread usually contains 15 grams of carbohydrate, roughly fully starch). By contrast, the recommended lowest intake of 130 grams of carbohydrate per day.

Low-carbohydrate diets frequently differ in the specific amount of carbohydrates allowed, whether particular types of foods are favored, whether occasional exceptions are permitted, etc. Commonly they all agree that processed sugar must be eliminated, or at the very least completely reduced, and equally generally keep back heavily processed grains (white bread, etc.). They vary greatly in their recommendations as to the quantity of fat permitted in the diet though the most accepted versions today (including Atkins) commonly advocate at most a reasonable fat intake.

Even though low-carbohydrate diets are as a rule usually discussed as a weight-loss method some experts have proposed using low-carbohydrate diets to moderate or stop diseases ranging from diabetes to cancer to epilepsy. Really, it has been argued by various low-carbohydrate proponents and others that it is the increase in carbohydrate intake, especially refined carbohydrates, that has caused the epidemic levels of several diseases in modern society.

Being a associated note, there is a arrangement of diets identified as low-glycemic-index diets (low-GI diets) or low-glycemic-load diets (low-GL diets), particularly the Low GI Diet. As a matter of fact, low-carbohydrate diets are, exactly speaking, low-GL diets (and vice versa) in that they exclusively limit what contributes to the glycemic quantity in foods. In preparation, though, "low-GI"/"low-GL" diets fluctuate from "low-carb" diets in the subsequent behavior. First, low-carbohydrate diets treat all nutritive carbohydrates as having the similar result on metabolism and commonly suppose that their outcome is free of other nutrients in food. Low-GI/low-GL diets base their recommendations on the real calculated metabolic (glycemic) repurcussions of the foods eaten. Subsequently, on a realistic matter, low-GI/low-GL diets normally do not suggest diets with glycemic loads low enough to diminish insulin creation and stimulate ketosis, whereas low-carbohydrate diets generally do.

One more linked diet sort, the low-insulin-index diet, is exceedingly comparable except that it is based on measurements of direct insulemic responses (i.e. the amount of insulin in the bloodstream) to food rather than glycemic response (the quantity of glucose in the bloodstream). While the diet recommendations typically involve lowering nutritive carbohydrates, there are a quantity of low-carbohydrate foods that are discouraged as well (e.g. beef).

About the Author:

No comments:

Post a Comment